![]() ![]() Cross-Defendant Minako argues the declaratory relief cause of action is not ripe for review. On September 4, 2020, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Minako America Corporation filed a demurrer pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 430.10 and a motion to strike pursuant to California Code of Civil Procedure section 435.ĭefendant/Cross-Complainant Minako America Corporation (“Cross-Defendant Minako”) asks the Court to sustain its demurrer to Defendant/Cross-Complainant Crown Castle Fiber LLC’s (“Cross-Complainant Crown”) cross-complaint. alleging breach of contract and seeking express indemnity, equitable indemnity, contribution, apportionment, and declaratory relief. On June 29, 2020, Defendant/Cross-Complainant Crown Castle Fiber LLC filed a cross-complaint against Defendant/Cross-Complainant Minako America Corporation and Cross-Defendant Line Works Construction, Inc. On Plaintiff filed an amendment to her complaint to rename Doe 1 as Defendant Crown Castle Fiber LLC. Plaintiff alleges negligence for falling over a metal sign that was left lying flat on a sidewalk on January 10, 2020. Krim (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint against Defendant Minako America Corporation dba Minco Construction. ![]() ![]() Having considered the demurring, moving, opposing, and reply papers, the Court rules as follows. Case Number: *******7700 Hearing Date: DecemDept: 28 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |